Explore GameReplays...

Battle for Middle Earth

Dogs&BHvsChyna&Nonsense

#1(BH)ownage  Dec 20 2009, 02:18 AM -
Replays: 30 Game:
Awards:
Lol at this game. Dogs played very well you will see me make some retarded errors such as running into isens base and doing nothing but for the most part this was a gg. Entertaining but not perfect from my end. Chyna and dogs played well though so its worth a watch.
#2ValsaDoom  Dec 20 2009, 16:22 PM -

Replays: 51 Game:
Such an intellegent play from all 4 players in this game, both isen players use a different strategy at start. they had the advantage after Chyna took midle, but that lucky cast of wormtongue Grill's saruman did when they were destroying his castle, made a big difference in the game, plus you manage to kill Chyna's Ara right after that, reversing the odds. True you send 3 sets of roherrims without lds into NONS3NSE castle, that was indeed (nonsence) but worst then that, is when you got pissed at Lurtz and ran after him into Chyna's camp getting own so bad there, witout killing Lurtz, that is. Was funny, but i understand the frustration, Imo the fact that you kept Ara close to your mates army early in the game, much more early then Chyna did, helped Grill gets fast pp and finaly Balrog so faster then NONS3NSE.

So much more entertaning then a gondor mirror game 1v1, I watched it until NONSENSE last tower stand.

GG
This post has been edited by ValsaDoom: Dec 20 2009, 22:16 PM
#3(BH)ownage  Dec 20 2009, 21:05 PM -
Replays: 30 Game:
Awards:
yeah i made that mistake with lurtz, i thought i could get him someone used pal must of been nonsense that didnt help me. But was a high paced game and someone is going to make mistakes. When i got to nonsenses base i didnt notice any weak spots. Usually i attack the weak spot in the base - no towers/no pikes/low level building ect instinctively but i couldnt see anything lol was just a stupid decision which i probably wouldnt make in a cw but its ok in a ffg. Thanks for the comments!
#4ValsaDoom  Dec 20 2009, 22:24 PM -

Replays: 51 Game:
That is why this game was so entertaining, insted of accumulating $ and doing notin, you made things happen (all 4 players did actually) but talking about that nonsence ride your roherrims had in NONS3NSE camp, I take my words back, it was not so wortless move after all, at least you knew what was there without giving too many pp.
Hope some people will watch the game, Imo it's worth the time, and it worth the WUB.
non-stop action!
This post has been edited by ValsaDoom: Dec 20 2009, 22:26 PM
#5N0NS3NSE`  Dec 20 2009, 23:28 PM -
Replays: 5 Game:
One of my first games after a two week break, I'm quite rusty. tongue.gif
#6(BH)ownage  Dec 21 2009, 09:02 AM -
Replays: 30 Game:
Awards:
the thing was dogs had a bad start eco wise so that was quite a problem. And it gave nonsense a chance to come back even though we took both his mills. Plus dogs didnt take palantir coz he needed fast industry so i was at a disadvantage everytime chyna chased me down with horses.
#7Valor`  Dec 21 2009, 15:22 PM -
This game wasn't that good, basically you only won because they did some retarded mistakes.
#8RaGe`  Dec 21 2009, 15:56 PM -
Replays: 13 Game:
Awards:
nice BH knowledge
#9(BH)ownage  Dec 21 2009, 21:27 PM -
Replays: 30 Game:
Awards:
QUOTE
This game wasn't that good, basically you only won because they did some retarded mistakes.



lol thanks valor..... People make mistakes every game including you and everyone else. I dont know how mistakes make it a "bad game". There is always a way you can "micro better" or whatever. Compared to the bullshit 4v4s and 3v3s that are getting posted i think this game is pretty good.
#10ValsaDoom  Dec 22 2009, 04:01 AM -

Replays: 51 Game:
QUOTE
This game wasn't that good, basically you only won because they did some retarded mistakes.


This is your point of view and I respect it, and honestly I think you have a good judgment, cause you have lots of experience, and when we talk about bfme, I am certain that you Valor, you can make the difference between somtin good and somtin bad. So I have a question for you; is it possible that you've seen those 4 players or any other good players with about the same skills, playing on this map with almost same situation, I mean Rohan/Isen vs Rohan/Isen? I supose you will say yes, and many times, but I will let you confirm that if you care enough.
If that is the case, then maybe you will agree with me that some of those games were good... lets suppose some of em or good, I can't belive you never find one of em good enough... anyways, what I mean is maybe after seeing all those games, it takes a lot more then that to impress you now. Am I right?


ps. Imo it was Bh and Dogs who made the most mistakes in that gr, yet they manage to come back, they made more mistakes but also they did extraordinary moves.
Reply to Comment