Battle for Middle Earth

This was an excellent game showing how mordor,isen can be beat through brillaint play by a gondor and a rohan. I'm sure this rep is awesome, so the RR's can trust me on that one.

gr8 play by EC espcially gondor early stage kept greatwizards eco down at all times he lost this trool pit was major turning point but other then that all players played v well imo i had to use immense mmicro throught v hard vs 5 sets of horses . gg

Not a good game to be hounest. EC had the game down from the start hands down on that. It seemed to me that WaR are either not very good with Evil or have never played in this map before (although you people play allot of 2vs2), i say that because both of you failed to take advanatage of your starting units as Evil units own good units easily. For example at start you do not both double rohan in the same place but then split off in the process and come back together again, that only gives Rohan Peasent and Merry easier bait. Instead of both going for same farm, divide so if to say 2 Orc for Rohan farm and Urukhai for the other farm, that would confuse the Rohan player and would delay his economy.

Isengard really played it sloppy, Mordor even more sloppier all through the entire game, Isengard for example attacking in small Pikeman group against Archers (Fire archers infact), allowing your base to be repeatbly harrased by meer 2 gondor knights , in one instance you could have easily blocked them from leaving your base if u placed the Pikeman correctly instead of chasing it. Going for Lurtz after 2 sets of Pikeman would have been much better, true the upgrades get delayed but Lurtz own Horse specially when he is at 3 with carnage. Mordor well, why make 2 orc pits? that made no good for you, its not like you even attempted to harrase their farms you just gathered them in the centre to get trampled over . Making Haradrim Palace would have been a better investment as Archer/ Soldier of Run mix could have clearly ended your missery but instead you decided to keep spamming more orcs to give the Gondor/Rohan the PP they needed, carlessly attacking in Small groups when Mordor should be attacking in Big Groups, you lost 2 Nazgul for no reason and infact you did not even bother to fly away with one of your nazgul which was floating on top of the archers and got shot down without any attempt by you to save it. Isengard well where do i start, is Pikeman spammage all you know? Archer > Pikeman, you should have made archers of your own and properly blended them with the Pikeman as to precvent them from being crushed, also Lurtz is the KEY to winning Good side and you really should have invested more effort in Lurtz to be level 5 so that he wont be killed by a single istari.

One thing for the Isengard you only need 3 Pikeman staying back, one for upper lumber, 1 next to your citadel/upgrade and other between your second lumber and mordor lumber.

What can i say, EC clearly played better and i knew they would have won ( One remark though, on the gondor dont buy the centre without having the neccesary back up to prevent it from being owned )

5/10 for me, clearly one sided game.......

do u play clan wars? rofl evil owns good early ganme k well go vs ecs gondor and see who wins the starting battle vs pros u have 2 play your best like i said they played v well and made us look ordinary they played top. end of the day u cant flame us unless uve beat us or owned us thx. also gondor is v hard to get the horses with elite micro with out trools u have 2 rely on pikes that means u have spam like hell 2 protect there base as well so i had a lot to do around my base and my partners. about sending pikes into archers u crazy u have 2 do that or they jus gonna run to your base and own it if thats the point where he has a massive army. and we payed this map well over a 1000 times now throught my game span on bfme and evil is my best army and i thought i played it well also thats only mine and wizards 2nd game 2gether so thx

AsHs, I'm gonna watch this, but tbh, I think G&R have no chance if played well by both teams.

btw, Cor[T]iCoiD, your comments suit a 1v1 game, not a 2v2.

My Oppinion stands on the matter. You dont like it, then why post.

AsHs, I know this is a bit self defeating, but your B.O. was the reason for your loss, nvm other factors.
You must build extra units, a small psnt spam will always beat mordor's.

check this out, I assure you it'll help
http://www.gamereplays.org/community/index...showtopic=15519

ill give this a review and see if its any good =P

i like to adapt my strat im not a 1 start person or bo i adapt to the opponent i cant be arsed t watch this rep i mgiht have done wrong but to become a really good 2v2 isen u have2 have multipul strats and bo depending on what uni there going army and situation your in otherwise ull end up as 3-9 on cw cause ppl will fidure ure stat and bo out and counter it