Explore GameReplays...

Company of Heroes

[Req] [1.6] Golradaer (Armor) vs nystrom (Blitzkrieg)

#1nystrom  May 7 2007, 08:12 AM -
Replays: 29 Game:
Awards:
Heres a match that I just got done playing with Golradaer. I'm not sure how good this replay is in terms of entertainment, because I was in the zone and it felt a lot more intense to me while I was playing. Don't let that stop you from checking it out though, its a great game nonetheless. Theres a lot to learn too if you're looking to improve on either your allies or axis on this map.

A review would be cool if you have the time, don't rush yourselves though.

GG
#2Major  May 7 2007, 09:57 AM -
Awards:
very nice match from you, I think Gol wasn't able to flank you, which was crazy tbh.


nice way not to lost those tigers and very good puma micro as well in general.
#3AfTeRShoCk  May 7 2007, 10:47 AM -
Replays: 17 Game:
Awards:
I wasn't really impressed by Gol's play, he lost his first halftrack very clumsily and his first pershing was also dead really fast.
#4HeroicCompany  May 7 2007, 10:48 AM -
Replays: 17 Game:
Awards:
very consistent micro and tactical position throughout the match. Not many "Oh noes! wtf was i doing?!" moments that stain the gameplay.

Definitely won by superior tactics and skills, and not "WTF LUCKY BULLSHIT" moments.

good game both of ya =)

Edit: Aftershock, i felt that by his first pershing, he had already started making reckless decisions as a result of being outplayed. However, gol's micro was there in terms of sniping units whilst trying to avoid anti-tanks stuff. The fact that he had to use his pershing to try and harass nystrom, rather than a counter-offensive of combined arms, was what cost him his pershing. I saw it as he lost his pershing because of a succession of bad decisions, rather than sloppy micro.

If u'd notice, gol likes to harrass all over the map with well micro-ed armor. In this case, nys proved sturdy in his defense, hence gol's tactical harrassments failed.
This post has been edited by HeroicCompany: May 7 2007, 10:54 AM
#5Major  May 7 2007, 10:52 AM -
Awards:
QUOTE
Definitely won by superior tactics and skills, and not "WTF LUCKY BULLSHIT" moments.

good game both of ya =)

thumb.gif
#6GIH  May 7 2007, 11:12 AM -
Replays: 0 Game:
good game guys.

Anyone else notice how impotent tank MGs seem to be vs any infantry? If you haven't watched this replay yet take note.

I don't think any inf are killed by Tiger/Pershing mgs even when right next to inf and they're not in cover.
This post has been edited by GIH: May 7 2007, 11:18 AM
#7Gotcho  May 7 2007, 15:33 PM -
Replays: 0 Game:
A very good match, a real clash of titans. numchuks.gif

Everybody should have a watch and look at not only the micro but the placement of each of the units on the field.

Shows how well both players anticipated each others moves.
#8Sean1604  May 7 2007, 15:35 PM -
Replays: 34 Game:
Awards:
pretty decent game, not the best play i've seen by gol but none the less fun to watch.
Reply to Comment